4 Comments
User's avatar
Amy Hanacek's avatar

Spot on, plus those constant forced/unforced “aromatic” hugs are totally in violation of CUSD policies:

Key Aspects of the Policy

Prohibited Actions: Adults are forbidden from initiating contact with students for personal reasons outside the scope of their duties and must not show favoritism or manage student emotions in an inappropriate manner.

Permitted Actions: Physical contact is only allowed when it is necessary in an emergency or to serve a legitimate purpose related to instruction, counseling, student health, or safety.

Reporting Violations:

Employees: Any employee aware of a violation must report it to the Superintendent or their designee through the appropriate channels.

Other Adults: Any other adult with knowledge of a violation is encouraged to report it to the District.

**blatant abuse of authority and never reported forcing students who feel very unsafe/uncomfortable to duck & dodge

Expand full comment
Michelle's avatar

Isn't it illegal in CA to record someone without their knowledge???

Expand full comment
Sparkplug761's avatar

Yes, you couldn’t use anything obtained in court but it sounds like they are going vigilante here anyway. They are also asking people to turn teachers in (to?) that said negative things about Charlie Kirk. Sounds like they plan on doxxing teachers. This also seems like a great way to map a school for bad things. Or for people to record in locker rooms etc. I thought these people wanted to protect children from predators?

Expand full comment
anneke.gambina@gambina's avatar

So, the party that is hysterical about their children being unsafe and targets for traffickers wants unprotected, unscreened footage of their children falling into god-knows-whose hands? It’s like creating a catalogue of children complete with names and schools, possibly even locations for the dark web? Is that what I’m reading?

Expand full comment