Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Sharon Borg Wall's avatar

Joe Kerr is the kind of public service-oriented individual who would be an asset in the U.S. Congress.

Kenneth Cooper's avatar

What a bleak argument for democracy.

I don’t think democracy works best when candidates are expected to “stand down” because someone wealthy entered the race. This obsession with clearing the field for wealthy self-funders is part of what’s hollowing out Democratic politics.

Money matters in politics largely because it helps candidates reach voters. Nobody’s naïve about that. But money isn’t the sole mechanism for reaching voters. Voter outreach doesn’t only happen through TV ads and glossy mailers.

Over 130,000 labor households in CA-40 is not insignificant political infrastructure.

Kerr’s ability to reach voters looks different because he has decades of relationships with labor groups and community networks that are embedded in the district and actively communicating with their own members on his behalf.

I’ve spent enough time at No Kings rallies to know people aren’t exactly in the mood for coronation politics. Why would we march against kings and oligarchs one weekend, then turn around and argue Democrats should just anoint the wealthy self-funder because she can spend the most money?

Bottom line, voters do have a choice, and candidates should earn support, not demand it through wealth and false inevitability narratives.

21 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?